It witnessed the participation of 114 officers, all of which are linked to the UAE Executive Office for Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing.
The diploma was developed by Dubai Police experts, under the supervision of the UNODC, said Maj-Gen Al Jallaf. It was implemented after the two parties signed an agreement to develop the programme last year. Based on the UN standards and mechanisms, the programme was created by the Dubai Police General Command in partnership with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) office of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)
The police seized large amounts of cash in the money laundering investigation in which Jumbo CEO Frits van Eerd is also a suspect.
[ still in restricted custody](https://nltimes.nl/2022/09/28/prime-suspect-money-laundering-case-stay-jail-case-tied-jumbo-ceo), which means he is only allowed contact with his lawyer. Van Eerd’s lawyer also did not respond to that question, according to the newspaper. A spokesperson for the Public Prosecution Service (OM) confirmed this to De Telegraaf but didn’t mention amounts.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has claimed that three private television channels -- 'Fakht Marathi', 'Box Cinema' and 'Mahamovie' -- their owners and ...
[Dailymotion ](https://www.dailymotion.com/DeccanHerald) [Facebook ](https://www.facebook.com/deccanherald/) [Twitter ](https://twitter.com/DeccanHerald) Singh (Mahamovie) and their company Teleone Consumers Pvt. Sharma (Box Cinema) and his entity Box Cinemedia Pvt. Singhal (Fakht Marathi) and their company Lotus Enterprises; Narayan N.
DUBAI, 30th September, 2022 (WAM) -- The Dubai Police General Command and the regional office of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) in the ...
Al Jallaf elaborated that Diploma was developed by Dubai Police experts and under the supervision of the UNODC to qualify specialised experts in combating money laundering as per best practices, taking into account the methodology of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the strategy of the General Secretariat of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime, and all related international conventions. Major General Jamal Salem Al Jallaf, Director of the General Department of Criminal Investigation(CID), stressed that the launch of the Diploma comes in line with the strategic directions of the National Committee for Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism and Illegal Organisations and its subcommittees to tackle crime and ensure the safety and security of all communities. DUBAI, 30th September, 2022 (WAM) -- The Dubai Police General Command and the regional office of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) in the GCC have recently launched an international diploma specialising in combating money laundering and terrorist financing as per the United Nations standards and mechanisms in this regard.
All the accused in the massive scam -- running into several hundreds of crores of rupees -- had conspired to manipulate the miniscule statistical data of ...
(The above story first appeared on LatestLY on Sep 30, 2022 03:25 PM IST. Singh (Mahamovie) and their company Teleone Consumers Pvt. Sharma (Box Cinema) and his entity Box Cinemedia Pvt. Singhal (Fakht Marathi) and their company Lotus Enterprises; Narayan N. "He (Pattanshetty) is the prime conspirator who devised the entire manner and the mode of the fraud, conspiring with the other accused for accumulating more advertisement revenue," said the ED. The ED said that Pattanshetty and his partner Singhal "connived and conspired" with several of the 16 co-accused by giving money to the viewers to boost the viewership (TRP) of Fakht Marathi to generate advertising revenues, with the help from many former officials of the Hansa Research Group (HRG).
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Saturday dismissed a plea by Delhi minister Satyendar Jain challenging a lower court order to transfer the money.
The agency, in its transfer application before the district judge, had argued that while there was no complaint against the judge hearing the matter, it was “a case of probable bias” in favour of the Delhi minister and there was an apprehension that it might not get an independent and impartial hearing. The AAP leader argued before the high court that the ED cannot be allowed to brow beat a judge and seek transfer of the case citing “bias” without any basis. New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Saturday dismissed a plea by Delhi minister Satyendar Jain challenging a lower court order to transfer the money laundering case against him to another court.
The Delhi High court on Saturday dismissed the plea of Delhi Minister Satyender Jain challenging the trial court order transferring.
The conduct of the LNJP doctor was also fishy. It was submitted that not only the report but the entire system is false. Even his wife was also there in the hospital. He also submitted that the jail doctor’s conduct was fishy. He was shifted to the LNJP hospital from the jail hospital. He also submitted that the objection was raised before the trial court that this report is fishy and an independent report may be called from an independent hospital. The senior advocate Sibal had argued that there was not a single order in favour of the petitioner. At the outset of the arguments in the morning, it was stated by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal on behalf of Jain that the ED sought a transfer of the case after my rejoinder on the bail application was over. The second ground was that the judge did not agree to call for an independent report from AIIMS, Safdarjung or any independent hospital. The judge had said that the report is not before me let it come. During the rebuttal argument, Senior Advocate Rahul Mehra argued that there is no material to show biasedness on the part of the judge. Justice Yogesh Khanna dismissed Jain’s plea challenging the order of September 23, 2022, passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge transferring his money laundering case from one court to another.
Satyender Jain had moved Delhi High Court challenging Principal District and Sessions Court of Rouse Avenue Court order allowing ED Petition for transfer of ...
New Delhi: The Delhi High court on Saturday dismissed the plea of Delhi Minister Satyender Jain challenging the trial court order transferring his money laundering case to another judge. During the rebuttal argument, Senior Advocate Rahul Mehra argued that there is no material to show biasedness on the part of the judge. Justice Yogesh Khanna dismissed Jain`s plea challenging the order of September 23, 2022, passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge transferring his money laundering case from one court to another.
Justice Yogesh stated that all facts were duly considered by the Principal District and Session's Judge while transferring the case, which is being probed ...
Jain was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in an alleged money laundering case and sent to custody till June 9. Jain argued before the high court that the ED cannot be allowed to “brow beat” a judge and seek transfer of the case citing "bias" without any basis. "The petition is therefore, dismissed," the court said in its order, as reported by the news agency PTI.
Money laundering case: The district judge's order was passed on an application for transfer moved by the investigating agency.
[Delhi court transfers money laundering case against Satyendar Jain to another Judge](https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/india/delhi-court-transfers-money-laundering-case-against-satyendar-jain-to-another-judge-latest-updates-aam-aadmi-party-minister-2022-09-23-810821) Money laundering case: The Delhi High Court on Saturday (October 1) dismissed a plea by Delhi minister Satyendar Jain challenging a lower court order to transfer the money laundering case against him to another court. - The case is related to transfer the money laundering case against Satyendar Jain to another court
The Delhi High Court on Saturday dismissed a plea by Delhi minister Satyendar Jain challenging a lower court order to transfer the money laundering case ...
The agency, in its transfer application before the district judge, had argued that while there was no complaint against the judge hearing the matter, it was "a case of probable bias" in favour of the Delhi minister and there was an apprehension that it might not get an independent and impartial hearing. The AAP leader argued before the high court that the ED cannot be allowed to browbeat a judge and seek transfer of the case citing "bias" without any basis. The Delhi High Court on Saturday dismissed a plea by Delhi minister Satyendar Jain challenging a lower court order to transfer the money laundering case against him to another court.
Uniindia: New Delhi, Oct 1 (UNI) Delhi High Court Saturday dismissed the petition of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and Delhi''s Health Minister Satyendar ...
[see more..](/5g-tech-will-revolutionise-telecom-sector-pm/india/news/2833515.html) 01 Oct 2022 [see more..](/kharge-tharoor-in-direct-contest/india/news/2833585.html) 01 Oct 2022 [see more..](/ls-to-organise-program-for-youth-on-birth-anniv-of-mahatma-gandhi-shastri/india/news/2833604.html) 01 Oct 2022
Justice Yogesh Khanna dismissed Jain's plea challenging the order of September 23, 2022, passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge transferring ...
New Delhi [India], October 1 (ANI): A Special Court on Saturday took cognizance of a prosecution complaint (Chargesheet) filed by the Enforcement ...
According to the ED, Sanjay Pandey was the founding director of iSec and floated this company in 2001 and was having 50 per cent equity in the company till 2006. 4.54 crores was approximately made by NSE to iSec for this work. The payment for this illegal act was also made by NSE to iSec. It has been alleged that illegal phone tapping of NSE employees was done between 2009-17 by M/s iSec service Pvt Ltd. Accordingly, examination of the complainant is dispensed with, said the court. Therefore, an examination of the complainant is not necessary.
On 30 May, the 57-year-old was arrested by the ED under criminal provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
The minister is accused of laundering money through four firms that are reportedly linked to him. The minister had filed a petition in the Delhi High Court challenging the judgement of the Principal District and Sessions Court of Rouse Avenue Court admitting the ED Petition for transfer of his case to another judge. Justice Yogesh Khanna denied Jain's petition contesting the judgment of the Principal District and Sessions Judge shifting his money laundering case from one court to another on September 23, 2022.
Special Judge M G Deshpande said in his order that there is prima facie case to hold that the two were involved in generating proceeds of crime on the basis ...
Special Judge M G Deshpande said in his order that there is prima facie case to hold that the two were involved in generating proceeds of crime on the basis of false, forged and false documents of properties. The accused had claimed that the statements given to the ED by witnesses were contradictory. The ED, through Special Public Prosecutor Sanjana Sharma, had submitted that four FIRs were registered against them in Nagpur on allegations of usurping of properties valued at Rs 36 crore.
The court noted that various documents and statements recorded under the provisions of PMLA, prima-facie, indicate that a forged and fake power of attorney ...
In the second case, the brothers allegedly grabbed five-and-half acres of land at Bokhare from one Mohammed Jaffar. In one of the cases, they grabbed one-and-a-half acres of land in the Babulkheda area of Nagpur around two decades ago. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested the Uke brothers in March under the PMLA.
The decision was made today by Justice Yogesh Khanna, who said that it is more important to take into account the anxieties of the opposing party than the.
ED requested that judge Geejanjali Goel transfer Jain’s case to judge Vikas Dhull, and Jain filed a plea with the Delhi High Court disputing that request. The suspicion cannot be said to be unfounded or unjustified as a result. The appeal was denied.
The Special Anti-Money Laundering Act (PMLA) Court in Mumbai on Saturday denied bailing lawyer Satish Uke and his brother in Nagpur on bail in a money.
“I do not believe that the PMLA case against both defendants was clearly initiated for an ulterior, unclear motive, to take revenge on the defendants and to ameliorate them on the basis of personal and personal resentment. The court found that both defendants usurped the land using false and forged documents and then sold them, accepting cash, which is tantamount to generating proceeds from the crime. On their basis, real estate was illegally purchased and then sold for cash, the court said, adding that Satish Uke admitted accepting cash in its statement.