Mr Musk faced a class-action lawsuit filed on behalf of Tesla shareholders who argued he misled them with his posts in August 2018. The proposed $72bn (£60bn) ...
and it went higher, which is counterintuitive," he said - arguing the effect his tweets have on the stock price can be unpredictable. Securities fraud lawyer Reed Kathrein called the tweet about taking Tesla private "as concrete a statement of taking a company private as there can be", and said the not guilty verdict was "a travesty to investors and the securities laws". After a lawyer representing shareholders accidentally called Elon Musk "Mr Tweet", Elon Musk promptly changed his name on Twitter to the same moniker. We need rules to save us from anarchy. Rules should apply to Elon Musk like everyone else." Tesla founder Elon Musk has been cleared of wrongdoing for a tweet in which he said he had "funding secured" to take the electric carmaker private.
A U.S. jury on Friday found Tesla Inc CEO Elon Musk and his company were not liable for misleading investors when Musk tweeted in 2018 that he had "funding ...
"The whole case is built on bad word choice," he said. But he acknowledged he lacked formal commitments from the Saudi fund and other potential backers. The fund later backpedaled on its commitment, Musk said. Tesla shareholders claimed Musk misled them when he tweeted on Aug. anti-securities fraud law "has always been thought to be this great bulwark against misstatements and falsehoods," he said. Ives added that some Tesla investors feared Musk might have to sell more Tesla stock if he lost.
A jury has found Elon Musk not guilty of fraud over a series of tweets in 2018 in which he declared he had “funding secured” to take the electric car ...
Read the original piece [here](https://www.dw.com/en/elon-musk-found-not-liable-in-trial-over-2018-tesla-tweets/a-64609149). Shareholders sued Musk, claiming the billionaire had acted recklessly. Musk tweeted that he had “funding secured” and said the next day that “investor support is confirmed.”
Legal analysts expressed shock at the verdict, warning: 'Musk lives by his own rules, or so it seems'. FILE PHOTO: Tesla Inc CEO Elon Musk walks next to a ...
The US anti-securities fraud law “has always been thought to be this great bulwark against misstatements and falsehoods,” he said. He said that Mr Musk did not need the Tesla board’s approval for the “funding secured” tweets. and it went higher, which is counterintuitive,” he told the court. Rules should apply to Elon Musk like everyone else.” We need rules to save us from anarchy. His tweets – “am considering taking Tesla private at $420.
Billionaire makes surprise appearance in California court for closing arguments; jurors believe Musk was credible when he said he thought he had Saudi ...
He could have been saddled with a bill for billions of dollars in damages had the jury found him liable for the 2018 tweets that had already been deemed falsehoods by the judge presiding over the trial. He defended his initial August 2018 tweet as well-intentioned and aimed at ensuring all Tesla investors knew the automaker might be on its way to ending its run as a publicly held company. The automaker based in Austin, Texas, is now worth nearly $600 billion, despite a steep decline in its stock price last year amid concerns that Musk’s purchase of Twitter would distract him from Tesla. During their discussion with Porritt, the jurors told them they found Musk’s testimony that he believed he had lined up the money from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund without a written commitment to be credible. A few hours later, Musk sent another tweet indicating that the deal was imminent. The nine-member jury reached its verdict after less than two hours of deliberation following a three-week trial.
The three-week long trial saw Mr Musk spend nearly eight hours on the witness stand defending his motives. | ITV National News.
Shortly after the verdict was announced, Mr Musk celebrated on Twitter, saying: "Thank goodness, the wisdom of the people has prevailed!" Although Mr Musk was not present for the reading of the verdict, he did make a surprise appearance earlier on Friday for the closing arguments. The nine-member jury reached its verdict after less that two hours of deliberation, following a three-week trial which saw Mr Musk spend nearly eight hours on the witness stand defending his motives.