Attorneys will give closing arguments and send case, over a 2016 ski collision between the actor and a retired optometrist, to jury.
On Wednesday, Paltrow’s defense used most of their final full day in control of the witness stand to call medical experts. Sanderson said she ran into him and sent him “absolutely flying”. Residents have filled the courtroom gallery. “That’s the purpose: to make me regret this lawsuit. A day earlier, they read depositions from Paltrow’s two children, Apple and Moses. They have painted him as an “obsessed” man pushing “utter BS” claims against someone whose fame makes them vulnerable to unfair lawsuits.
No matter the verdict of her ski trial, Gwyneth Paltrow seems to have won in the court of public opinion. But why did this particular trial become such a ...
[apologized for her foul language](https://twitter.com/asteel2/status/1639385878740213760?s=20) in the aftermath of the collision, I felt like I was watching Roxie Hart in Chicago describing how she and Fred “both reached for the gun.” This trial might not have music or murder, but it shares Chicago’s central observation about American society: In America, you can get away with pretty much anything as long as you are entertaining enough. But all it took was a few [suffragette-chic courtroom outfits](https://twitter.com/carriesnotscary/status/1640728821665021952?s=20) and memeable moments for naysayers to change their tune. Heard](https://www.thecut.com/tags/johnny-depp-amber-heard-trial/), the societal consequences felt high and the allegations were distressing. Compared to the multimillion-dollar fraud scheme led by Real Housewives of Salt Lake City star [Jen Shah](https://www.thecut.com/2023/01/jen-shah-sentenced-prison-rhslc.html), or the [college-admissions scandal](https://www.thecut.com/tags/operation-varsity-blues/) that ended with Desperate Housewives star Felicity Huffman serving jail time, this celebrity trial stems from an accident. [backlash](https://www.thecut.com/2023/03/why-does-gwyneth-paltrow-do-rectal-ozone-therapy.html) after sharing her diet in an interview with Dr. Perhaps because we’re never quite sure how much of her persona is real, and how much is a performance. When asked how the crash inconvenienced her, Paltrow uttered eight words that changed pop-culture forever: “ [Well, I lost half a day of skiing](https://twitter.com/LouisStaples/status/1639725184658571264?s=20).” [$200 million](https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/actors/gwyneth-paltrow-net-worth/).) With recent trials like [Depp v. (Her net worth is reportedly in the region of [trial of the century](https://twitter.com/JennyJohnsonHi5/status/1639418357995950081?s=20)” — for women and gay men, specifically — has been full of bizarre moments. The trial has ended up on TV, bringing what would typically be a mundane legal process right onto our screens, and turning it into a true-crime series, a courtroom drama, and a [fashion show](https://www.thecut.com/2023/03/gwyneth-guilty-of-impeccable-courtroom-style.html) all in one. [glided into the Park City, Utah, courthouse](https://www.thecut.com/2023/03/gwyneth-paltrow-is-in-court-over-a-ski-collision.html) last week, wrapped in an aspirational olive coat and chunky cream sweater that probably cost more than the average worker’s monthly rent, her ski trial has become an unexpected social-media spectacle.
The closely watched trial over a 2016 ski collision between Gwyneth Paltrow and the retired optometrist suing her for the injuries he sustained is expected ...
But Gwyneth Paltrow's livestreamed trial over her collision with Terry Sanderson in Park City has emerged as the biggest celebrity court case since actors ...
Rather than revealing GoPro footage though, it contained a chatroom discussion between members of Sanderson’s ski group, including the man claiming to be the sole eyewitness who testified Paltrow crashed into Sanderson. Sanderson’s daughter testified this week that an email she sent the day of the accident referring to a GoPro didn’t imply footage existed. Viewers tuning into proceedings on CourtTV have seen Paltrow complain about losing a half-day of skiing after the crash and heard a radiologist testify that Sanderson could no longer enjoy wine tasting. Paltrow’s defense team has called the highly publicized case an attempt to exploit her fame and suggested that she’s vulnerable to unfair, frivolous lawsuits. Sanderson’s side has tried to characterize Paltrow, the actor-turned-lifestyle influencer, as clumsy, out of touch, and evading accountability. They’ve said the accident caused Sanderson to grow distant from friends and family, and they called his ex-girlfriend to testify about how their relationship deteriorated because he “had no joy left in his life.”
Health experts would regularly profess shock and disgust at the medical misinformation Paltrow peddled on her luxury website Goop, while media outlets ...
Her entire appeal is predicated not on her relatability but on the fact that she is absolutely nothing like you, never has been, and never will be. If nothing else, the warm and cozy exchange between VanOrman and Paltrow demonstrates that we still don’t want to Eat the Rich nearly as much as we want to be even in mildly close proximity to them. And the fact that she is not only honest about that, but hilariously, unflinchingly so, is what makes her Mother. (That figure was later reduced to $300,000, though neither amount would have significantly hurt Paltrow, who is worth an estimated $200 million.) The resulting trial, which has thankfully been recorded for posterity, has captured the hearts of people on the internet, with everything from Paltrow’s effortlessly minimalist chic courtroom style (including $1,450 Prada combat boots and an So it’s no surprise that Paltrow’s deadpan testimony that she “lost half a ski day” as a result of the incident would be subject to memeification. But with Paltrow, the privilege is the point. We still live in a country that worships at the altar of consumer capitalism; we still live in a world where one of the wealthiest and most batshit insane men on the planet is heralded by many as a likable Everyman. Goop is a multimillion-dollar company, and Paltrow is regularly heralded as a scrappy, savvy, self-made entrepreneur; she even recently served as a guest on Shark Tank, advising entrepreneur hopefuls who did not have the benefit of attending one of New York’s most eminent private schools or being the daughter of a famous director. Just last year, the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard case launched Etsy shops selling trial merch and even TikTok videos of cats lipsynching Heard’s testimony. These days, making fun of Gwyneth Paltrow seems boomer-esque and faintly embarrassing, like texting someone a Bitmoji or saying “lol” in casual conversation. She was simultaneously dismissed as an out-of-touch celebrity and held up as an eminent danger to society. In the post-Covid landscape, however, everything has changed.
OJ Simpson has come to the defense of Gwyneth Paltrow in her ongoing ski collision trial and shared that he has also gotten into minor accidents on the same ...
“I crashed with the same woman twice on one run and if you asked me, it was her fault. And I’m sure if you asked her, it was my fault,” he said. He was later tried and acquitted of her murder in 1994. “I was watching today, I saw the run that their accident happened on. It was the same run that my accidents happened at Deer Valley, and I don’t know who you can determine whose fault it was,” the former football player and one-time murder suspect said in a video OJ Simpson has come to the defense of Gwyneth Paltrow in her ongoing ski collision trial and shared that he has also gotten into minor accidents on the same slope at the resort.
The "Daily Show" comedian was an avalanche of funny in mocking Paltrow's "white people court" ski trial.
Terry Sanderson claims Paltrow crashed into him, leaving him with four broken ribs and symptoms that have lasted years beyond the collision.
"The uphill skier has to watch out for the downhill skier. In the final hour of their last full day to call witnesses, they called Sanderson back to the witness stand. In other words, the downhill skier — the person who is further down the slope — has the right of way. Though both sides have marshaled significant resources to emerge victorious, the verdict could end up being remembered as an afterthought dwarfed by the worldwide attention the trial has attracted. "That's the purpose: to make me regret this lawsuit. Sanderson's attorneys are expected to begin on Thursday morning by recalling their medical experts to rebut claims made by Paltrow's.
Retired eye doctor Terry Sanderson, 76, alleges Ms Paltrow crashed into him, leaving him with life-changing injuries. He is seeking $300,000 (£245,000) in ...
Ms Paltrow denied being responsible for the accident during her testimony last week. Ms Paltrow, 50, blames him for the accident, and her lawyers argue he is exploiting her celebrity status. The Oscar winner is countersuing for $1 plus her legal fees.
The actress's 'quiet luxury' look is providing ultra-rich pickings for fashion fans.
For cost savings, you can change your plan at any time online in the “Settings & Account” section. Compare Standard and Premium Digital For a full comparison of Standard and Premium Digital,
The closely watched trial over a 2016 ski collision between Gwyneth Paltrow and the retired optometrist suing her for injuries he sustained is expected to ...
In the final hour of their last full day to call witnesses, they called Sanderson back to the witness stand. They chose to call four medical experts to testify rather than Paltrow's husband, television producer Brad Falchuk. Though they've tapped into themes including the power of fame throughout the trial, they said that the case ultimately wasn't about celebrity, but simply damages. Sanderson’s attorneys are expected to begin on Thursday morning by recalling their medical experts to rebut claims made by Paltrow’s. They said the crash at Deer Valley Resort had changed the course of Sanderson's life. In a courtroom more packed Thursday than any other day of the trial, Sanderson's attorneys gave their closing arguments first.
The actress-entrepreneur's courtroom wardrobe of rugged luxury pieces, menswear-inspired suiting, and Park-City-chic sweaters has summoned a new problematic ...
On the first day of the trial, which commenced last week, Paltrow wore a slouchy cream turtleneck and an olive alpaca-wool overcoat from Ashley and Mary-Kate Olsen’s luxury brand The Row, paired with toffee-brown, lace-up Celine boots that resemble an incredibly sumptuous pair of Timberlands. The New York Times declared that her looks constitute “a new style subgenre that ought henceforth to be known as courtcore.” And with Paltrow—like another fellow (if fictional) wealthy creative who recently caught our eyes, Cate Blanchett’s EGOT-winning conductor Lydia Tár—it looks like we’ve got another (potentially) [problematic menswear fave](https://www.gq.com/story/tar-movie-style-bina-daigeler-interview) on our hands. (For you legal-eagles: The case, Sanderson v.
The actress-turned-businesswoman is at the center of a trial that has become a fierce debate over a simple question: Who skied into whom?
Ms. The trial of Ms. “Security for my client wanted to bring in treats for the bailiffs for how helpful they’ve been,” the lawyer, Stephen W. The odd rapport between Ms. Now she’s at the center of a trial that amounts to a fierce debate over a simple question: Who skied into whom? Perhaps it was in response to Ms.
Jurors in the civil trial stemming from a ski collision involving Gwyneth Paltrow are now deliberating.
Testimony from Paltrow’s two children, Apple and Moses Martin, was also read to the jury during the trial. “All I saw was a whole lot of snow.” “Part of him will always be on that mountain,” he said. Paltrow’s attorney James Egan, in his portion of closing, referred back to the opposing side’s comments, saying: “Ms. [The trial ](https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/21/entertainment/gwyneth-paltrow-ski-collision/index.html)began on March 21. Paltrow’s attorney, Steve Owens, meanwhile, asserted in closing that for Paltrow, it’s an issue of right and wrong and that it would be “easy” for Paltrow “to write a check and be done with it,” but said that would be “wrong.”
In Utah civil court, the actress has unabashedly leaned into every stereotype that has ever been used to label her, in a performance that rises to the level ...
Paltrow has largely left the screen behind, but she is, after all, still an actress, and parts of her testimony feel like they could have been stripped from “ [The White Lotus](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/on-television/more-deadly-decadence-in-the-white-lotus),” “ [Triangle of Sadness](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/in-triangle-of-sadness-the-crudity-is-the-point),” “ [Succession](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/on-television/succession-finally-moves-forward),” or another satire of the ultra-wealthy. But as Paltrow herself has [said](https://nypost.com/2009/02/05/the-girl-who-fell-to-earth/), in 2009, “I am who I am,” adding, with a fairly rare candor, “I can’t pretend to be somebody who makes twenty-five thousand dollars a year.” [Watching](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JNwCRReUIQ) Paltrow purse her lips gravely after being asked whether the collision deterred her from enjoying her vacation, a question to which she responded with the words “Well, I lost half a day of skiing” made me want to grab my popcorn. (As the hosts of the culture podcast “How Long Gone” have noted, she’s taking us back to “a different era of celebrity,” when stars didn’t bother acting as if they were just like us.) [trial](https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-los-angeles/harvey-weinstein-the-monster-of-metoo-trial-los-angeles), in Los Angeles (he was found [guilty](https://variety.com/2023/film/news/harvey-weinstein-los-angeles-new-trial-charges-dismissed-1235553360/) on three out of seven charges); the rape trial of “That ’70s Show” actor Danny Masterson (it ended in a [mistrial](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/30/arts/television/danny-masterson-rape-case-mistrial.html), and he will be retried); and then, of course, the [biggest press-spectacle trial](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-depp-heard-verdict-is-chilling) of 2022, in which Johnny Depp alleged that his ex-wife, Amber Heard, defamed him in a Washington Post op-ed, and was awarded fifteen million dollars in damages (the amount was much reduced in an eventual settlement). She must be fully aware of how she comes across, and chooses to perform her diva role to the hilt, taking it to the level of Ryan Murphy-esque high camp. She claims that Sanderson was the one who crashed into her, and that, contrary to his version of events, she was the skier further down the slope, who should have been given the right of way, according to Sanderson says that he suffered various physical and mental injuries from the collision (broken ribs, brain trauma) and originally sought 3.1 million dollars in damages, though that sum has since been [reduced](https://www.vulture.com/2023/03/gwyneth-paltrow-ski-collision-trial-court-lawsuit-news.html) to three hundred thousand dollars. [online roundups](https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/gwyneth-paltrows-most-obnoxious-quotes-2011279/) of her [out-of-touch quotes](https://www.attitude.co.uk/culture/film-tv/13-of-gwyneth-paltrows-most-amazingly-unrelatable-quotes-290297/) have been perennially reliable content workhorses. The actress has unabashedly leaned into every stereotype that has ever been used to label her, showing up to court, day after day, impeccably turned out in well-cut garments by leading designers, in shades of taupe, ivory, slate, and olive. So it is perhaps no wonder that one of the most-watched news events of late has been Gwyneth Paltrow’s trial, in Utah civil court, for a luxury-ski-resort accident from her past. Terry Sanderson, a seventy-six-year-old retired optometrist, was at the resort at the same time as Paltrow, and in 2019 he
Terry Sanderson claims Paltrow crashed into him, leaving him with four broken ribs and symptoms that have lasted years beyond the collision.
"The uphill skier has to watch out for the downhill skier. In the final hour of their last full day to call witnesses, they called Sanderson back to the witness stand. In other words, the downhill skier — the person who is further down the slope — has the right of way. Both sides have argued that their client was the downhill skier, making the other culpable according to a skier responsibility code. Though both sides have marshaled significant resources to emerge victorious, the verdict could end up being remembered as an afterthought dwarfed by the worldwide attention the trial has attracted. Sanderson's attorneys are expected to begin on Thursday morning by recalling their medical experts to rebut claims made by Paltrow's.
A jury dismissed the complaint of a retired optometrist who sued Paltrow over injuries he sustained when the two crashed on a beginner run at Deer Valley ...
[Sundance Film Festival,](https://apnews.com/hub/sundance-film-festival) where early in her career Paltrow would appear for the premieres of her movies including 1998’s “Sliding Doors,” at a time when she was known primarily as an actor, not a lifestyle influencer. Paltrow’s defense team represented Sanderson as an angry, aging and unsympathetic man who had over the years become “obsessed” with his lawsuit against Paltrow. Paltrow in response countersued for $1 and attorney fees, a symbolic action that mirrors Taylor Swift’s response to a radio host’s defamation lawsuit. Sanderson, 76, broke four ribs and sustained a concussion after the two tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow landing on top of him. The dismissal concludes two weeks of courtroom proceedings that hinged largely on reputation rather than the monetary damages at stake in the case. “I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity,” Paltrow said in a statement released by her representatives.
Hollywood actor and lifestyle guru found not liable for collision with optometrist Terry Sanderson in Park City in 2016.
He wrote on the day of the crash that Paltrow had crashed into his friend. The Hollywood A-lister Paltrow, 50, won concessions from the court to limit press and onlookers as she entered each day, often in a different outfit. Sanderson, 76, had initially brought a claim for $3m against Paltrow, but that was knocked down to $300,000 before the trial began. “I listened to how I was characterized … Separately, Sanderson said it was a “real disappointment” at how he had been characterized during the trial. In an emailed statement, Paltrow said: “I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity.
A verdict has been reached in the civil trial between Gwyneth Paltrow and Terry Sanderson over a 2016 ski crash.
As a result of the accident, Sanderson said he now speaks "upside-down and backward." [Paltrow claimed](https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/culture/story/gwyneth-paltrow-testifies-ski-crash-trial-98105427) she was skiing with her two children, daughter Apple and son Moses, and her husband Brad Falchuk, her then-boyfriend, when "Mr. The next thing he remembered, he said, was that "everything [was] black." Paltrow's attorney, Steve Owens, said in a statement, "We are pleased with this unanimous outcome and appreciate the judge and jury's thoughtful handling of the case. She sought "symbolic damages" of $1 "plus her costs and attorneys' fees" for defending herself against "this meritless claim." "I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity," Paltrow said in a statement.
A jury ruled Thursday that actress Gwyneth Paltrow is not liable for an accident on a swanky US ski slope, as it dismissed a $3.3 million damages.
I've never been hit that hard, and I'm flying," he told the jury earlier. "You heard from his own expert... "Terry doesn't want to be brain injured. that he's obsessed with this case and it's not good for him, that moving on would be helpful for him," Egan told the jury. They said that evidence showed he had run into the back of her while she was on the slopes with her children, Apple and Moses. That amounts to "$3,276,000 for the 17 years that Terry has to deal with this permanent brain injury."
A jury has found US actress Gwyneth Paltrow was not at fault for a 2016 ski crash at a resort in Utah. Retired optometrist Terry Sanderson, 76, ...
Kristan VanOrman, one of Mr Sanderson's lawyers, had told Paltrow during cross-examination that she was jealous of her height. Paltrow then skied away while he remained unconscious in the snow with broken ribs, Mr Sanderson said. "I thought, 'Is this a practical joke? She then left the courtroom, declining requests for comments. Speaking to reporters after the verdict, she said she was "not starstruck" by Paltrow. Speaking to media outside, her lawyer Steve Owens said Paltrow "has a history of advocating for what she believes in".
Retired optometrist Terry Sanderson had sued the actress for more than $300000 over a 2016 collision on a ski slope.
[testified](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gwyneth-paltrow-ski-collision-trial-testimony-plaintiff-terry-sanderson-takes-stand-watch-live-2023-03-23/) that at first, she thought the accident was a "sexual assault" or a "practical joke." "He was groaning and grunting in a disturbing way," Paltrow testified. It felt like it was perfectly centered, the fists and the poles were right there, at my shoulder blades. "I got hit in my back so hard, and right at my shoulder blades. "I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity," Paltrow said in a statement after the verdicr was read. "We are pleased with this unanimous outcome and appreciate the judge and jury's thoughtful handling of the case," Patlrow's attorney, Steve Owen, said in a statement.
(CNN) -- Gwyneth Paltrow has prevailed in the civil trial relating to a 2016 ski collision. A Utah jury on Thursday found Paltrow, an Oscar-winning actor ...
Testimony from Paltrow's two children, Apple and Moses Martin, was also read to the jury during the trial. "All I saw was a whole lot of snow." "Gwyneth has a history of advocating for what she believes in -- this situation was no different and she will continue to stand up for what is right." Paltrow's attorney James Egan, in his portion of closing, referred back to the opposing side's comments, saying: "Ms. "Part of him will always be on that mountain," Sykes said in his closing arguments. "I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity.
The verdict is a blow for Sanderson, who filed the lawsuit against Paltrow seeking $300,000 in damages for the injuries he sustained after she allegedly plowed ...
During closing arguments he told jurors that Paltrow had decided to take a stand in fighting Sanderson's case. "You lose everybody — your family, they'll put up with you, and maybe the lawyers. "Part of Terry will forever be on the Bandara run," Sykes told the jury. "All I saw was a whole lot of snow. The verdict is a blow for Sanderson, who filed the lawsuit against Paltrow seeking $300,000 in damages for the injuries he sustained after she allegedly plowed into him. As a result, he said, he suffered four broken ribs and lifelong brain damage.
The verdict came after more than a week of testimony that covered skiing etiquette, medical history and celebrity culture.
Mr. Ms. Moses, who was 9 at the time, said he had been skiing with an instructor when he “briefly” saw the collision and skied over to find his “mother and a person behind her” on the ground. Alina Fong, a concussion specialist, who said Mr. Sanderson testified that he heard a “bloodcurdling scream” just before a “serious, serious smack” sent him “absolutely flying.” His concussion, he said, had caused his personality to change and turned him into a “self-imposed recluse” who got confused and felt unsafe. The other skier, Terry Sanderson, 76, a retired optometrist, had sued Ms.
It might be just a skiing accident, but the legal fight between A-lister Gwyneth Paltrow and Terry Sanderson, a 76-year-old retired optometrist, ...
Sanderson claimed he was skiing down the right side of the run when he heard “a blood-curdling scream … “Gwyneth Paltrow looks like she’s on trial in 1987 for hiring a hitman to kill her husband,” read one widely circulated tweet. Paltrow said that rather than return to the slopes, she scheduled a massage.
LOS ANGELES: Gwyneth Paltrow is not liable for an accident on a swanky US ski slope, a jury ruled Thursday, as it dismissed a claim from a retired ...
I've never been hit that hard, and I'm flying," he told the jury earlier. "You heard from his own expert... "Terry doesn't want to be brain injured. that he's obsessed with this case and it's not good for him, that moving on would be helpful for him," Egan told the jury. They said that evidence showed he had run into the back of her while she was on the slopes with her children, Apple and Moses. That amounts to "$3,276,000 for the 17 years that Terry has to deal with this permanent brain injury."