Lacoste

2024 - 9 - 16

Supreme Court Ruling: No More Crocs and Logo Rocks!

brand identity - Crocodile brand - fashion industry - intellectual property - Lacoste trademark - logo dispute - Philippine Supreme Court

Lacoste’s trademark battle is over and the verdict is in: No confusion between crocs and crocodiles. Dive into this legal showdown that kept us guessing!

In a landmark decision, the Philippine Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the local brand Crocodile in its long-standing trademark dispute with the iconic French sportswear brand Lacoste. The case, which had kept legal experts and fashion enthusiasts on their toes, centered around whether or not consumers would confuse the two crocodile-themed logos. The court ultimately determined that there was no confusing similarity between the brands’ logos, significant relief for Crocodile, and a stark reminder to Lacoste that local brands can stand their ground.

The court noted that although both companies sport a crocodile as their emblem, the distinct visual differences between the logos were significant enough that consumers would easily differentiate between them. In simpler terms, it was like comparing apples and oranges—or more fittingly, crocs and crocodiles. Notably, the ruling clarified that Crocodile had no intention of riding on the goodwill of Lacoste’s established brand, a fact that showcased the homegrown brand’s commitment to its identity.

This ruling is a win not just for Crocodile but also for local brands everywhere. It empowers smaller companies to protect their intellectual property and emphasizes the importance of unique branding in a world filled with knock-offs and similar logos. In a world dominated by global brands, this decision brings a reassuring clarity to the trademark landscape within the Philippines.

As an interesting fact, Lacoste, originally created by tennis player René Lacoste in the 1930s, has evolved into a global fashion phenomenon known for its polo shirts and emblazoned crocodile insignia. Conversely, the local brand Crocodile began as a response to the influx of international brands and has carved out a niche for itself, proving that homegrown talent can thrive amidst global competition.

In conclusion, this ruling not only showcases the importance of protecting one’s brand but also highlights the dynamism and resilience of Filipino companies. So next time you see those crocodile logos, remember: they might both look fierce, but they can coexist in the marketplace without stepping on each other’s toes!

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Philstar.com"

Philippine Supreme Court snaps shut Lacoste's case against ... (Philstar.com)

After a longstanding dispute between two crocodile-themed brands over their logos, the Supreme Court has ruled that there is no confusing similarity between ...

Lacoste loses trademark fight vs Crocodile in the Philippines (Rappler)

The Supreme Court rules that there are 'distinct visual differences' in both their logos, and that Crocodile has no intent to 'ride on the goodwill of ...

Explore the last week